Allegro sp. z o.o. Rotten Score Breakdown
πΌCorporate Misconduct
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 1Contribution: 0.0 pts
Allegro fined PLN 206 million for abusing dominance to favor its own store
The President of UOKiK found that Allegro abused its dominant position on the allegro.pl marketplace by favouring its own online store over independent sellers using the platform. UOKiK found that Allegro used information and platform mechanisms unavailable to competing sellers, making independent offers less visible and less likely to be chosen. In December 2022 the authority ordered Allegro to stop the conduct and imposed a PLN 206,169,786 fine. Because appeal closure was not established in this review, the record is marked unresolved. Source: https://archiwum.uokik.gov.pl/news.php?news_id=19185
π°Human Rights & Exploitation
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
πFraud & Corruption
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
π§ͺDeceptive Practices
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 1Contribution: 0.0 pts
Allegro fined PLN 3.97 million for prohibited unilateral contract-change clauses
In a separate December 2022 consumer-protection decision, the President of UOKiK found that Allegro used prohibited clauses giving itself broad rights to unilaterally amend contractual terms, including terms governing the paid Smart service. UOKiK found that consumers who prepaid for multi-month services had a right to expect the agreed conditions to remain stable and imposed a PLN 3,970,677 fine. Allegro stopped using the contested clauses in new templates and declared it would not rely on them for existing contracts. Because final appeal closure was not established, this record is marked unresolved. Source: https://archiwum.uokik.gov.pl/news.php?news_id=19185
π¨Environmental Harm
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
π±Sustainability Deception
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
πΈWorkplace Misconduct
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
β οΈFinancial Misconduct
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: βRatings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts