Rotten Company

Expose Corporate Wrongdoing — Backed by Evidence

A public index of companies ranked by documented wrongdoing—not opinions.

Bad companies count on silence.

Expose how they really behave. Build the record—and warn others before they give them their time, work, or money.

Submit Evidence

Takes ~2 minutes • Upload documents or links • Reviewed before publishing

Anyone can complain. Evidence makes it count.

Explore the Rotten Index →

The Rotten Index

View full index →

Top 10 companies by documented harm.

#CompanyRotten Score
1Meta59.3
2UnitedHealth Group45.1 +45.1 this week
3JBS36.2
4McKinsey & Company36.2
5Amazon31.3
6Boeing25.9
7Rio Tinto20.1
8Volkswagen13.9 +6.7 this week
9Nestlé12.6
10Tesla7.2

Biggest movers this week

Companies with the largest score changes in the past 7 days.

↑ Worsening

Recent activity

The 5 most recently approved evidence submissions.

CompanyEvidenceApproved
Rio TintoRio Tinto Review Finds Systemic Bullying, Sexual Harassment and Racism Across WorkplacesAug 7, 2026
Rio TintoRio Tinto Destroyed 46,000-Year-Old Aboriginal Heritage Site at Juukan GorgeAug 7, 2026
Danske BankDanske Bank Debt-Collection Errors Led to Overcollection and Compensation for Tens of Thousands of CustomersAug 7, 2026
Danske BankDanske Bank Pleads Guilty in Multibillion-Dollar Estonia Fraud SchemeAug 7, 2026
TrafiguraTrafigura Found Guilty in Switzerland Over Bribery of Angolan Oil OfficialAug 7, 2026

How it works

1

Submit Evidence

Upload documents, PDFs, or screenshots and provide a short summary of the misconduct you witnessed.

2

A Joint Community Effort

Rotten Company is maintained together by the community. Submissions are reviewed by other users against simple guidelines before acceptance.

Before submitting evidence for the first time, registered users complete a small number of moderation tasks when available. This shared responsibility keeps the platform credible.

3

Score Impact

Verified evidence updates the company's Rotten Score in the public index, helping others assess workplace risk.

Our principles

Evidence-Based

All scores are derived from submitted documentation, not opinions or anonymous ratings.

Moderated Submissions

Every submission goes through a review process before it can affect any score or appear publicly.

Protects Regular Employees

We focus on leadership decisions and systemic harm — not on individual non-executive staff members.

Governance & Fairness

  • Evidence-first moderation — every submission is reviewed against documented evidence before it can affect any score or appear publicly.
  • Remediation evidence — submit evidence of corrective actions; remediation is reviewed like any other evidence.
  • No anonymous scoring — all evidence submissions require a verified account; anonymous ratings are not accepted.
  • No paid removals or reputation laundering — scores reflect evidence only and cannot be purchased, boosted, or suppressed.