Rotten Company

Expose Corporate Wrongdoing — Backed by Evidence

A public index of companies ranked by documented wrongdoing—not opinions.

Bad companies count on silence.

Expose how they really behave. Build the record—and warn others before they give them their time, work, or money.

Submit Evidence

Takes ~2 minutes • Upload documents or links • Reviewed before publishing

Anyone can complain. Evidence makes it count.

Explore the Rotten Index →

Find a Company

Search by name to open a company's profile and evidence record.

The Rotten Index

View full index →

Top 10 companies by documented harm.

Top 10 companies by documented harm
#CompanyRotten Score
1Meta84.7
2UnitedHealth Group55.5
3Deutsche Bank52.8
4Amazon45.1
53M Company40.8
6Boeing39.0
7McKinsey & Company36.2
8Experian plc36.2
9JBS36.2
10HSBC Holdings plc36.2

Biggest movers this week

Companies with the largest score changes in the past 7 days.

↑ Worsening
Company7-day changeRotten ScoreStatus
OBAYASHI CORPORATION+7.27.2Mostly Decent
Hyundai Motor Company+7.27.2Mostly Decent
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.+7.27.2Mostly Decent
SK Telecom Co., Ltd.+3.03.0Mostly Decent
Kakao Corp.+3.03.0Mostly Decent
LG Uplus Corp.+0.80.8Mostly Decent

Recent activity

The 5 most recently approved evidence submissions.

CompanyEvidenceApproved
Kakao Corp.Korean privacy regulator fined Kakao over OpenChat-user data leakSep 21, 2026
SK hynix Inc.Hynix agreed to plead guilty and pay $185 million over DRAM price fixingSep 21, 2026
LG Uplus Corp.Korean privacy regulator fined LG Uplus KRW 6.8 billion for customer-data breachSep 20, 2026
Hyundai Motor CompanyHyundai entered multistate settlement over anti-theft weaknesses in U.S. vehiclesSep 20, 2026
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.European Commission fined Samsung SDI in cathode-ray-tube cartelsSep 18, 2026

How it works

1

Submit Evidence

Upload documents, PDFs, or screenshots and provide a short summary of the misconduct you witnessed.

2

A Joint Community Effort

Rotten Company is maintained together by the community. Submissions are reviewed by other users against simple guidelines before acceptance.

Before submitting evidence for the first time, registered users complete a small number of moderation tasks when available. This shared responsibility keeps the platform credible.

3

Score Impact

Verified evidence updates the company's Rotten Score in the public index, helping others assess workplace risk.

Our principles

Evidence-Based

All scores are derived from submitted documentation, not opinions or anonymous ratings.

Moderated Submissions

Every submission goes through a review process before it can affect any score or appear publicly.

Protects Regular Employees

We focus on leadership decisions and systemic harm — not on individual non-executive staff members.

Governance & Fairness

  • Evidence-first moderation — every submission is reviewed against documented evidence before it can affect any score or appear publicly.
  • Remediation evidence — submit evidence of corrective actions; remediation is reviewed like any other evidence.
  • No anonymous scoring — all evidence submissions require a verified account; anonymous ratings are not accepted.
  • No paid removals or reputation laundering — scores reflect evidence only and cannot be purchased, boosted, or suppressed.