Rotten Company

Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A. Rotten Score Breakdown

💼Corporate Misconduct

Rotten to the core

Avg Rating: 5.00Ratings: 1Severity Score: 6.00Evidence Count: 1Contribution: 30.0 pts
Misconduct: low 0 · medium 0 · high 1
Remediation: low 0 · medium 0 · high 0ⓘ cap: 25%
Galp bottled-LPG territorial restrictions upheld by Lisbon Court of Appeal
The Portuguese Competition Authority concluded that companies in the Galp Energia group restricted distributors from selling bottled LPG outside allocated geographic territories, artificially partitioning the Portuguese market and reducing intra-brand competition. The Competition, Regulation and Supervision Court confirmed the infringement and imposed fines totalling EUR 4.1 million on Petrogal, Galp Açores and Galp Madeira. In January 2017 the Lisbon Court of Appeal upheld the infringement and the EUR 4.1 million total fine. The AdC litigation record identifies Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A. among the entities involved in the case. Sources: https://www.concorrencia.pt/en/articles/lisbon-court-appeal-upheld-portuguese-competition-authoritys-decision-against-galp-energia and https://extranet.concorrencia.pt/pesquisAdC/Page.aspx?IsEnglish=True&Ref=IDF_2015_1
📰Human Rights & Exploitation

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🎭Fraud & Corruption

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🧪Deceptive Practices

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🚨Environmental Harm

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🌱Sustainability Deception

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
💸Workplace Misconduct

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
⚠️Financial Misconduct

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts