Ashland Inc. Rotten Score Breakdown
💼Corporate Misconduct
Community concern only
Community ratings exist, but no approved evidence has been submitted. Community ratings do not affect the Rotten Score.
Avg Rating: 5.00Ratings: 1Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
📰Human Rights & Exploitation
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🎭Fraud & Corruption
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🧪Deceptive Practices
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🚨Environmental Harm
Ethics on life support
Avg Rating: 5.00Ratings: 1Severity Score: 12.00Evidence Count: 2Contribution: 60.0 pts
Misconduct: low 0 · medium 0 · high 2
Remediation: low 0 · medium 0 · high 0ⓘ cap: 25%
Ashland Settled Multiple Environmental-Law Violations for More Than $32.5 Million
In October 1998, Ashland Inc. agreed to spend more than $32.5 million to settle federal allegations of illegal pollutant discharges and reporting violations at petroleum refineries in Kentucky, Minnesota and Ohio.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Justice described the case as involving extensive and recurring violations of federal pollution-control laws affecting air, water and soil.
The settlement included penalties, environmental projects and measures intended to bring the facilities into compliance.
Source:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
https://www.epa.gov/archive/epapages/newsroom_archive/newsreleases/02dfd03be680a10885256690006612e2.html
Ashland Paid $60,000 to Resolve Hazardous-Air-Pollutant Violations at Illinois Resin Plant
In August 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reached an agreement with Ashland Inc. over alleged Clean Air Act violations at its resin manufacturing plant in Calumet City, Illinois.
EPA alleged that Ashland failed to comply with national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants and requirements in the facility's state operating permit.
The agreement included a $60,000 penalty and an environmental project costing $154,400. Ashland agreed to install and maintain sealless pumps designed to prevent leaks of hazardous pollutants.
Source:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
https://www.epa.gov/archive/epapages/newsroom_archive/newsreleases/feac729dce40f748852571c500586db1.html
🌱Sustainability Deception
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
💸Workplace Misconduct
No documented evidence
Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
⚠️Financial Misconduct
Community concern only
Community ratings exist, but no approved evidence has been submitted. Community ratings do not affect the Rotten Score.
Avg Rating: 5.00Ratings: 1Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts