Rotten Company
Score breakdown

Slovak Telekom, a.s. Rotten Score Breakdown

Corporate Misconduct

60.0pts

Rotten to the core

Avg Rating: 5.00Ratings: 1Severity Score: 12.00Evidence Count: 2Contribution: 60.0 pts
Misconduct: low 0 · medium 0 · high 2
Remediation: low 0 · medium 0 · high 0ⓘ cap: 25%
Slovak Telekom EUR 17.45 million dominance-abuse fine upheld by Supreme Court
The Slovak Antimonopoly Office found that Slovak Telekom abused its dominant position through a margin-squeeze strategy and tying practices in fixed telecommunications services. The authority found that wholesale and retail pricing prevented alternative operators from replicating Slovak Telekom's retail products and that bundled conditions created barriers to entry and restricted competition. A fine of EUR 17,453,362.54 was imposed. On 9 June 2021 the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic rejected Slovak Telekom's cassation complaint; no further appeal was available. Sources: https://www.antimon.gov.sk/sc-sr-upheld-the-decision-of-the-council-of-amo-sr-in-connection-with-the-decision-of-amo-sr-in-the-matter-of-abuse-of-dominant-position-by-the-company-slovak-telekom-a-s/ and https://www.antimon.gov.sk/slovak-telekom-as-bratislava/
EU fine against Slovak Telekom for broadband dominance abuse upheld by Court of Justice
The European Commission found that Slovak Telekom abused its dominant position on the Slovak broadband market by refusing effective access to its local loop and applying a margin squeeze that hindered competing broadband providers. The Commission imposed a joint and several fine on Slovak Telekom and Deutsche Telekom. After partial adjustment by the General Court, the Court of Justice dismissed Slovak Telekom's appeal on 25 March 2021, leaving the infringement finding in place. Sources: https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/redirect/juris/documents.jsf?critereEcli=ECLI%3AEU%3AC%3A2021%3A239 and https://curia.europa.eu/site/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-02/cp210021en.pdf

Human Rights & Exploitation

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts

Fraud & Corruption

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts

Deceptive Practices

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts

Environmental Harm

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts

Sustainability Deception

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts

Workplace Misconduct

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts

Financial Misconduct

0.0pts

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: —Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts