Rotten Company

Vivacom Bulgaria EAD Rotten Score Breakdown

💼Corporate Misconduct

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 6.00Evidence Count: 1Contribution: 0.0 pts
Misconduct: low 0 · medium 0 · high 1
Remediation: low 0 · medium 0 · high 0ⓘ cap: 25%
Vivacom fined BGN 3.75 million for unfair conduct toward rival telecom operator
In May 2015 Bulgaria's Commission for Protection of Competition imposed a BGN 3.75 million fine on Bulgarian Telecommunications Company, operating under the Vivacom brand, after a repeat investigation of a complaint by Eastern Telecommunications Company. The case concerned Vivacom's unilateral termination of an interconnection agreement and the competition authority found unfair conduct affecting a rival operator. Vivacom publicly stated that it would appeal the ruling. Because final appellate closure of this specific sanction was not established in this review, the record is marked unresolved. Source: https://sofiaglobe.com/2015/05/14/bulgarian-carrier-vivacom-fined-3-75m-leva-for-unfair-trade-practices/
📰Human Rights & Exploitation

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🎭Fraud & Corruption

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🧪Deceptive Practices

Toxic workplace vibes

Avg Rating: 5.00Ratings: 1Severity Score: 6.00Evidence Count: 1Contribution: 30.0 pts
Misconduct: low 0 · medium 0 · high 1
Remediation: low 0 · medium 0 · high 0ⓘ cap: 25%
Vivacom misleading EON TV Mobile practice finally confirmed by Supreme Administrative Court
Bulgaria's Supreme Administrative Court upheld a lower-court judgment rejecting Vivacom Bulgaria's challenge to a Consumer Protection Commission order prohibiting a misleading unfair commercial practice concerning the conditions for using EON TV Mobile. The courts found that Vivacom omitted material information about which devices were compatible with the service, information capable of affecting a consumer's decision to enter into the agreement. The underlying consumer complaint was filed on 15 November 2022, the prohibition order was issued on 12 July 2023, and the Supreme Administrative Court judgment in administrative case 1130/2025 was final. Source: https://sac.justice.bg/news/bg/202562-1
🚨Environmental Harm

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
🌱Sustainability Deception

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
💸Workplace Misconduct

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts
⚠️Financial Misconduct

No documented evidence

Avg Rating: Ratings: 0Severity Score: 0.00Evidence Count: 0Contribution: 0.0 pts